OUR VIEWS
Not clean enoughBirmingham's air is cleaner than it was 30,
20 or 10 years ago. It will almost certainly be cleaner in 10 years
than it is today.
The technology for controlling and preventing air pollution has
made great strides since air quality became a major national
concern. Even with no further improvement in the technology, the
spread of its use will continue to reduce pollution for several
years to come.
However, Birmingham's air is not as clean as the law currently
requires. Specifically, we have not met federal limits on
ground-level ozone since 1994.
Nor, we suspect, is our air as clean as it could have been with
more vigorous efforts in both the public and private sectors. For
years industry and government in this state have been reluctant to
do any more than they absolutely have to do to comply with federal
law.
That minimalist approach may be about to change. As so often
happens in this state, it will be because of the federal courts,
although this time neither of two cases directly involves state or
local government.
In one case, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has taken
several electrical power companies to court, claiming they failed to
comply with "new source review" requirements when they have repaired
and upgraded older power plants. The Bush administration appears to
be a reluctant participant in this case. It has proposed some
changes in the law that would ease the conditions under which new
source review is required.
However, the case is too far along to abandon and could result in
a court order to reduce emissions at some Alabama Power Co.
generating plants on a faster timetable than the company's own plans
call for.
The more significant court case may be the one in which EPA was
ordered last week to act on Birmingham's air problem within 120
days. While there will undoubtedly be further delays caused by
appeals, the judge has already indicated she will not tolerate
continued foot-dragging.
Nor is she likely to look with favor on a strategy being
considered by Alabama Department of Environmental Management and
regional EPA officials to make a post facto declaration that
Birmingham was in compliance with clear air standards in 1994 and
therefore should not be subject today to escalating sanctions.
If anything, an ADEM-EPA attempt to implement such a strategy
would likely backfire and further reduce the two agency's influence
on the judge's final clean-up order.
While we can't predict with certainty the steps that EPA will be
required to impose on this area, it is likely that vehicle emission
inspections and tighter controls on Alabama Power emissions will be
at the top of the list.
Our time limit for cleaning up the air with less intrusive
measures is running out.
A loud shoutThe skeptical wisdom in Washington is that when
either the House or Senate passes a measure unanimously, something
mischievous is afoot, and one and all had better duck.
Such is not the case with the anti-fraud measure, passed 97-0 by
the Senate on Monday, because American investors needed to hear a
loud collective shout from Congress. They needed to hear that
Congress is not about to put up with future corporate deviousness.
They needed to hear that getting tough is not a partisan or narrowly
ideological purpose, but that it is the purpose of every single U.S.
senator.
If the bill itself needs some revising here or there, that can be
done in conference committee as negotiators try to piece it together
with a House measure. The House itself voted Tuesday to change some
of what it did in an earlier bill, stiffening penalties for
corporate executives caught in criminal deeds.
In broad terms, the Senate measure seems on track. It aims to
enlarge oversight of accounting at publicly held firms. It aims to
make accountants less beholden to company managers for their
contracts and less likely to feel their companies will lose money if
they find something amiss. And it aims to make CEOs more accountable
for financial reports
The conference committee negotiators obviously need to get the
details right as they work out their compromises, but they should
not dawdle. President Bush has made it clear that he will sign a
measure that contains nothing too far out of line, and neither the
House bill nor Senate bill does contain any such thing.
The final shout is to have a new law on the books. Investors need
to hear that, too.
OTHER VIEWS
The path looks familiar
By ARGUS HAMILTON THE DAILY OKLAHOMANHOLLYWOOD — God
bless America, and how's everybody?
President Bush claimed innocence of corporate crimes Wednesday
and expressed his belief in Dick Cheney's innocence as well. It's
apparent where we're heading. Soon the word will be discreetly
passed along to Palm Springs to unfreeze Jerry Ford.
Ted Williams' will was made public on Tuesday, and it supports
his daughter's contention that he wanted to be cremated.
Unfortunately, he's frozen right now at minus 360 degrees. He looks
like he just heard from Dean Witter.
Democrats were unable to reach agreement in the debate over
health care plans for seniors. How high are medical costs? It's a
new rule that the emergency room at every hospital must be located
right next to the cashier's office.
American Airlines lost $495 million in the second quarter of this
year. Blame it on government meddling. When the Transportation
Security Administration starting requiring same-sex patdowns, many
people felt it took the fun out of flying. — Scripps Howard
News Service
Argus Hamilton can be reached at argusjokes@aol.com
YOUR VIEWS
Court doesn't apply justice equallyIn the mid 1980's, the
Supreme Court legalized binding arbitration in consumer contracts.
That ruling stripped consumers of the right under the Seventh
Amendment of the Constitution to take civil action if damaged or
defrauded.
In a recent case, the court ruled criminal defendants, even
involving only a suspended sentence, must be provided a lawyer
unless they "knowingly and intelligently" waive their constitutional
right to a lawyer.
In direct contrast, the court has held that citizens are not
required to "knowingly and intelligently" waive their Seventh
Amendment right to a trial by jury when binding arbitration clauses
are used, even though they are frequently hidden in sales
agreements.
Now comes a ruling involving a dispute between a Birmingham
company and a labor union. The ruling offers strong support for the
company's right to sue in civil court. Contrary to the earlier
decision involving binding arbitration in consumer contracts, the
court speaks glowingly of the right of this company to sue the labor
union.
In a unanimous ruling, the Supreme Court called the right to sue
"one of the most precious liberties safeguarded by the bill of
rights."
A question that begs for an answer is where is the court's
concern for the "precious liberties" and the "knowing and
intelligent" waiver of our citizens when it comes to their Seventh
Amendment rights.
The answer is obvious. Like the Congress that determines its
members, the court has aligned itself with the commercial interests
of this nation.
So much for equal justice under the law
Rick McBride Sr. 2320 Wentworth Drive Montgomery
In contextA letter writer recently displayed his anger at
President (Unimpeached) Bush's statement, "Thank you all very much.
This is an impressive crowd — the haves and the have-mores. Some
people call you the elite. I call you my base."
Lest some be fooled, the correct transcription reads, "Thank you
all very much. This is an impressive crowd — the haves and the
have-mores. (Laughter) Some people call you the elite. I call you my
base. (Laughter)."
Also troubling to the writer was Bush's, "You can fool some of
the people all of the time, and those are the ones you want to
concentrate on. (Laughter)"
At the same function, Al Gore stated, "I know some people are
going to keep accusing me of exaggeration, so let me be clear. Those
people seek nothing less than the complete destruction of the
American way of life. (Laughter) (Applause) It's absolutely clear. I
never exaggerate. You can ask Tipper or any one of our 11 daughters.
(Laughter)"
The occasion was the annual Al Smith dinner, a white-tie charity
event honoring the former Democratic governor of New York, at
which the presidential candidates were guest speakers. I gathered
from the writer that "Democrats are easily fooled and tend to
exaggerate." (Laughter?) (Applause?)
Armond "Si" Simmons 104 Wadsworth Lane Pell City
Return to '50sRev. Hank Shiver observed in his July 12
letter: "Since we officially started trusting in God, we have not
won a war, crime has skyrocketed, divorce is rampant, schools are
unsafe, and clerics rape our children."
He did not mention that, according to the Christian pollster
George Barna, the lowest rates of divorce are found among us
Atheists. Furthermore, published studies by criminologists have
found that Unitarians, Agnostics, Atheists and Free-Thinkers were
absent from penitentiaries, or nearly so.
It is imperative that we remove "God" from the pledge and our
money so that we can get back to the morality of the early 1950's.
After all, the greatest generation won World War II with the
original pledge and "E Pluribus Unum" as the national motto.
Larry Mundinger (formerly a 26-year Alabama resident) 741
Captains Drive St. Augustine, Fla.
LOOK BACK From Birmingham Post-Herald files:
50 years ago, July 19, 1952: Federal government begins
drafting plans for limited seizure of steel industry and rules out
any general price increase until strike ends. Both moves are seen as
effort to force settlement.
Finding reluctant applicants for superintendent position, board
of State Training School for Girls at Chalkville discusses
possibility of making school responsibility of state Department of
Public Welfare.
25 years ago, July 19, 1977: Piece of heavy construciton
equipment hits and breaks valve on Trans-Alaska pipeline, shutting
it down again.
Regional director of U.S. Office of Education relieved of duties
after audit reveals he took trips directly or indirectly paid for by
University of Alabama shortly after university received or requested
federal funds from director.
59 years ago, July 19, 1941: First black pilots in
American military begin flight training at Tuskegee.
|