By Ulrich Boser
In 1784, five years
before he became president of the United States,
George Washington, 52, was nearly toothless. So he
hired a dentist to transplant nine teeth into his
jaw--having extracted them from the mouths of his
slaves.
That's a far different image from
the cherry-tree-chopping George most people remember
from their history books. But recently, many
historians have begun to focus on the role slavery
played in the lives of the founding generation. They
have been spurred in part by DNA evidence made
available in 1998, which almost certainly proved
Thomas Jefferson had fathered at least one child
with his slave Sally Hemings. And only over the past
30 years have scholars examined history from the
bottom up. Works by Gore Vidal, Henry Wiencek, and
Garry Wills reveal the moral compromises made by the
nation's early leaders and the fragile nature
of the country's infancy. More significant,
they argue that many of the Founding Fathers knew
slavery was wrong--and yet most did little to fight
it.
More than anything, the historians say, the
founders were hampered by the culture of their time.
While Washington and Jefferson privately expressed
distaste for slavery (Jefferson once called it an
"execrable commerce"), they also
understood that it was part of the political and
economic bedrock of the country they helped to
create.
Political capital. For one thing,
the South could not afford to part with its slaves.
Owning slaves was "like having a large bank
account," says Wiencek, author of An
Imperfect God: George Washington, His Slaves, and
the Creation of America. The southern states would
not have signed the Constitution without protections
for the "peculiar institution," including
a clause that counted a slave as three fifths of a
man for purposes of congressional representation.
And the statesmen's political lives depended on
slavery. The three-fifths formula handed Jefferson
his narrow victory in the presidential election of
1800 by inflating the votes of the southern states
in the Electoral College. Once in office, Jefferson
extended slavery with the Louisiana Purchase in
1803; the new land was carved into 13 states,
including three slave states.
Still, Jefferson
freed Hemings's children--though not Hemings
herself or his approximately 150 other slaves.
Washington, who had begun to believe that all men
were created equal after observing the valor of
black soldiers during the Revolutionary War,
overcame the strong opposition of his relatives to
grant his slaves their freedom in his will. Only a
decade earlier, such an act would have required
legislative approval in Virginia. He suspected the
country would eventually come to its moral senses
and find the notion of owning other human beings
repugnant, says Joseph Ellis, author of the
bestselling Founding Brothers. "He knew his
legacy depended on it. He knew that we were
watching."
Yet how should we view other
framers of independence such as signer of the
Declaration of Independence Richard Henry Lee and
Patrick Henry, who traded and whipped their slaves?
Or James Monroe, who, as governor of Virginia in
1800, after rushed trials, executed nearly 30 slaves
after an attempted revolt? For some historians, such
actions cloud their legacy. "The other founders
resisted emancipation, not because it was a mad
scheme but because they did not want to relinquish
the wealth which slave sales poured into their
coffers," says Wiencek.
Other scholars
believe the Founding Fathers can best be seen
squarely within their time. "To contextualize
is not to excuse," says Rutgers University
historian Jan Lewis. "It's to show the
complexity." Understanding the early
leaders' severe lapse in judgment over slavery,
say Lewis and other historians, makes their ability
to found a new and democratic nation all the more incredible.