THE SUN HERALD It's easy to be neutral until you're in danger Just as our national media was Ho Chi Minh's strongest weapon without which he could have never driven our forces from Vietnam, the media has become bin Laden's strongest weapon. He's continually provided with details of our tactics, force structure, battle plans, shortcomings, and critically, our psychological state (as we speak, chaotic). He's also provided with a medium of communication with terrorist cells and the worldwide Muslim community upon which his success depends. Since WWII, to the detriment of most U.S. military operations that followed, the media has operated with unquestioned license, piously preaching 1st Amendment rights and their sanctified personal journalistic neutrality with allegiance to none. They bravely espoused these "rights" while secure in the knowledge that the country bound to their protection was never under threat of defeat or serious damage. With this war, however, will eventually come the realization that, unlike other recent wars, with the probability of eventual massive casualties and destruction of war on the homeland, their retreat to the safety of this nation cannot be guaranteed. Many wonder at what point the national media might begin to reassess their innate "neutrality" and the moral legitimacy in exercising their "rights" and begin to realize that "neutrality" and 1st Amendment rights are not guaranteed by the al-Qaida. Hopefully, the media will come to its senses before their doors are kicked down. ARMOND 'SI' SIMMONS Pell City, Ala. psysim@coosahs.net